skip to main |
skip to sidebar
I know this film back to front. I have no idea how many times I've seen it. It's not one of Fred Astaire's better known films, in fact it's toward the end of his career as a dancer. For some reason though, of all the films that my father showed me from the Astaire catalogue, I watched this one more times than any other. I love the behind-the-scenes nature of it, and the in-jokes (such as the digs about Charisse's height or Astaire's career).
Astaire was in his early 50s when this film was made, and as a result his dance numbers are more on the restrained side. That's not to say that they're lacking in style or class, not by a long shot. It's odd I guess that my favourite Astaire movie isn't one that really showcases what he's known for.
Whenever I watched this film with my father, he'd be in raptures over the "Dancing In The Dark" number. And "Shiny Shoes" is a joy, and the closest in style to a young Astaire. The shoe shiner in that number was apparently a real life shoe shiner, known for his rhythmical technique, and my father always wished to see more of him. And I just can't take my eyes off Nanette Fabray. To me, vaudeville trained performers were incredibly engaging, in a very particular way that you don't see much in modern films. Their style wouldn't really suit modern film, to be fair, but there's something so refreshing about it that I wish it was more common today.
Final Thought: At the time of writing this, The Bandwagon is available on DVD in Australia, but, despite my searching, I can't find ANY of the Astaire/Rogers catalogue. They were released on VHS when I was a kid, but I don't understand why I can't get them anywhere today on DVD. It's beyond frustrating.
Up Next: Basil, The Great Mouse Detective (1986)
Growing up, I always preferred Fred Astaire to Gene Kelly. Thinking about it tonight, I realised the oddness of that. Kelly is a more obvious choice for a young girl to swoon over, whether the focus be on his looks or his dancing. And, don't get me wrong, I was healthily obsessed with Kelly. But I think my father introduced me to Astaire first, so he always took first place. Plus, Astaire always seemed a bit more of a gentleman. Apparently Cyd Charisse once said that her husband could always tell which of them she had been working with that day - if she was covered in bruises, it was Kelly, if not, then it was Astaire.
Despite growing up with substantial exposure to the golden age of MGM musicals, I didn't watch An American In Paris as a kid. I didn't really feel the need to. I have a VHS of the documentary That's Entertainment (coming up later), which includes an edited version of the final ballet from this film. I'd heard that it was nearly 20 minutes long, and at that age I wasn't terribly interested in the whole thing. Plus, from what I saw, Leslie Caron wasn't a patch on Charisse. So why bother?
Consequently, I've only seen this film a couple of times. I must admit, I agree with those who say it's a bit of an overrated vanity piece. That's not to say that it isn't good, it's just not quite the masterpiece it seems to think it is. Visually it's a work of art, but where's the spirit?
Watching it tonight, it turns out that my favourite part of the whole thing is our introduction to Kelly in his apartment. His movements around the small space are so casually graceful, an elegant version of a morning routine, and I loved the subtlety of it. I actually thought to myself that it would be a shame if my favourite dance sequence was in the first 10 minutes, but it turns out that that was the case.
I almost feel that I'm betraying my love for Kelly by saying the above! He shines in this film, he always does. There's few things as delightful as Gene Kelly when he's delighted. He just seems to be taking himself a bit too seriously in this one. And Caron, to me, lacks the fire that it's fun to see Kelly up against.
Final Thought: There sure was a lot of vocal vibrato in the 1950s.
Up Next: Anchorman (2004)